Feb. 13th, 2014

scribblemyname: (ruffled feathers)

There are many issues that have me gnashing my teeth that people frequently confuse method with product, process with result. This is one excellent addressing of issue #14 or so of that peeve list.

If we understand story structure and can apply that knowledge, any drafting method could potentially work for us. With that skill under our belt, we can focus on the method that enables our writing to exhibit smooth story flow, natural dialogue, deep characterization, etc.

Some will find that plotting works for them, while others will discover that pantsing keeps them in touch with their muse-subconscious. For pantsers, stories will sometimes almost write themselves, right down to subtext, foreshadowing, subplots, character arcs, and themes.

Insinuating that writers should change their methods with insults or assumptions doesn’t solve an author’s underlying issues with structure. Pantsing isn’t broken or wrong if it works for you.

— Jami Gold, "In Defense of Pantsing"

Originally published at Liana Mir. You can comment here or there.

Profile

scribblemyname: (Default)
scribblemyname

July 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 04:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios